Ronald Klingebiel and
Arnoud De Meyer
Organization Science
Vol. 24, No. 1 (January-February 2013), pp. 133-153
Vol. 24, No. 1 (January-February 2013), pp. 133-153
Published by: INFORMS
Strategic initiatives
are projects that are crucial for organizations’ future success, and they are
usually associated with organizational strategic goals. In order to execute
those initiatives for organizational strategic goals, managers have to make
decisions on how they should behave differently based on different situations. Prior
researches suggest that decision makers usually have a set of preconceived
behaviors that they prefer to follow when they have enough information that are
related to their decisions. When they lack information, they will then change
their preconceived behaviors to make the best decision based on the information
they gathered, which is defined as adaptive decision-making. However, these
researches did not address how managers decide to adapt and what impact them to
choose to either stick to plans or learn by doing when they implement strategic
initiatives. In the study of Klingebiel and Meyer, they want to find out why
the managers decided to adapt and what impact them to adapt. They find out that
when the future is uncertain, managers tend to be more selective, deliberate
and diligent to change their behaviors. They also find out that analytical
comprehensiveness in adaptive decision-making is higher than preconceived
decision-making when the future is uncertain.
No comments:
Post a Comment